Last Updated on January 29, 2023 by Admin
Write an epilogue to The Cask of Amontillado in which a case against Montresor comes to trial
Write an epilogue to The Cask of Amontillado in which a case against Montresor comes to trial. In your epilogue, provide the prosecuting attorney’s closing argument, reminding the jury of any evidence that proves Montresor’s guilt. Then provide the defense attorney’s closing argument and describe the jury’s final verdict.
Your submission must:
- include a minimum of 275 words, written in paragraph form.
- be written in the third-person point of view (academic voice). You may write in the first-person point of view if you want to pretend you are Montresor.
- be double spaced. A title page, running head, and abstract are not required.
- be submitted as a Microsoft Word attachment on the submission page (click title above). Assignments not submitted in this way may be returned to you ungraded.
Edgar Allan Poe:
Biography, Vol. 1 pp. 731-735 and \”The Cask of Amontillado,\” Vol. 1 pp. 785-790
Expert Answer and Explanation
The Cask of Amontillado
Montresor is guilty of the crime he is accused of committing considering that the evidence presented before the court puts him at the center of the events leading to the death of Fortunato. While no witness came forth to give account of what happened on the night leading to Fortunato’s death, the fact that another individual listened as Amontillado confessed, is the available evidence which the court should rely upon to make appropriate ruling.
The word of the person who heard him confess of committing the act, can in this case be used to pin down Montersor. While Montresor managed to stay silent for the entire fifty-year period, he could not erase what he did from his conscience (Poe, 1846). For this period, he tried in vain to overcome the emotional burden of killing Fortunato. He feels guilt. Even on his deathbed, he confesses because he wants his conscience to be free, and he even goes further to request the priest to pray for him so that he be internally cleansed.
Fifty years have passed following the death of Fortunato, and it is difficult to tell whether he actually committed the crime he has confessed of committing. Given his age, Montressor seems to be suffering from a mental illness, and the court acting on this basis, should re-think the evidence presented by the prosecution (Poe, 1846). It is wrong to try the accused because they confessed when he probably was not in his right mind.
The Jury Decision
The Jury, based on the accounts given by the accused as stated by the witness, finds the accused guilty of killing Fortunato. The court has reached this decision after reviewing the events leading to the death of Fortunato, and examining the presented evidence (Poe, 1846).
Poe, E.A. (1846).The Cask of Amontillado. Biography, 1, 731-735, 785-790. https://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Poe/Amontillado.pdf.
Epilogue to “The Cask of Amontillado”
The day of the trial arrived and Montresor, the defendant of the case. Entered into the courtroom where whispers were heard from the people present to witness the proceedings. The whispers can be attributed to the already existing public knowledge of the inhumane act that Montresor had perpetrated towards someone else (Poe, n.d.). After a while, the courtroom settled down and the proceeding began where the prosecuting and defendant attorneys had to make the closing arguments for the final judgement to be made by the jury.
After the commencement of the trial, the prosecuting attorney began to deliberate on closing arguments by saying how the provided evidence is beyond reasonable doubt and implicates Montresor as responsible for the murder of Fortunato (Poe, n.d.). The prosecuting attorney proceed to recount how the bones of the diseased were found under the bed of the accused and that the DNA conducted on the bones reveal that they belonged to Fortunato. By hearing this verdict, the jury was seen to be whispering in low tones before the prosecuting attorney could continue with the closing statement.
The prosecutor iterates that in as much as they cannot prove whether or not the victim went there willingly, they can ascertain that the killer attempted to conceal the murder. From the evidence, the bones were retrieved from brick concealment and the DNA was found in ashes. The judge was observed to be shaking his head at seeing the images of the ashes and bones as discovered by the prosecutor (Poe, n.d.). The acquisition of the evidence from the house of Montresor led the prosecution to determine that he was responsible for the death of Fortunato and burnet his body to conceal the murder.
The defense attorney took the stage to speak and provide the closing statement. The statement began by first depicting the regret that Montresor had concerning the actions that led to the death of Fortunato. However, the defendant implies that Montresor is sick and did not have an understanding of what was happening (Poe, n.d.).
The reasoning from the statement is that an insane person does not have clear judgement and recollection of what is happening to them or the actions they are doing. Other than being sentenced to jail the defendant moved to plea that the Montresor be placed in a mental health facility where he should undergo medical care and be treated to avoid the occurrence of similar situations from occurring.
The defendant attorney suggests that it is only befitting for a mentally ill person to be placed in a facility that will help them overcome their challenges professionally than being locked away. The attorney also recommends the jury consider the needs of Montresor as a mentally ill person and allow him to get professional assistance.
Isolating the person might increase the stress and anxiety levels and potentially make them develop suicidal ideation. The end of the statement askes the jury to have mercy on Montresor concerning his mental state (Poe, n.d.). After the statement ended the jury were in a dilemma whether to grant Montresor mercy to see a medical professional or continue with the guilty verdict and sentencing to be done.
After deliberations, the jury concluded that Montresor was not sick as he was still alive even after 50 years, he was still able to remember events that occurred (Poe, n.d.). The decision by the jury found the defendant guilty and he be sentenced to life for abducting and torturing Fortunato to death and concealing the murder.
Poe, E. A. (n.d). The Cask of Amontillado. Vol. 1, 785-790.
Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.
Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
[ANSWERED] What is the significance of the product lifecycle
[ANSWERED] Select a family other than your own and seek
ANSWERED! In this project you will select an organization or
ANSWERED! How can different types of attributions and
ANSWERED!! Lily is a 20-year-old student at
ANSWERED!! What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms?
ANSWERED!! In 4 or 5 sentences describe the anatomy of the basic unit of the nervous system
“write an epilogue to the cask of amontillado in which a case against montresor comes to trial”
“which of the following is an example of an argument”
“which of the following is not an example of an argument”