Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

This paper should clearly and comprehensively identify the disease or population health problem chosen. The problem must be an issue in your geographic area and a concern for the population you will serve upon graduation with your degree. The paper should be organized into the following sections: Introduction with a clear presentation of the marginalized group as well as significance and a scholarly overview of the paper.

Rubric

NR602 Week 5 Assignment (1)
NR602 Week 5 Assignment (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of the chosen marginalized group

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Comprehensively identifies the chosen marginalized group.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Adequately identifies chosen marginalized group.

16.0 pts

Meets- Identification of chosen marginalized group is limited.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Identification of chosen marginalized group is unclear.

0.0 pts

Developing- Identification of chosen marginalized group is missing or not discussed.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackground and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence and prevalence statistics)

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Comprehensive review of background and significance of chosen marginalized group. Curent evidence supports background.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- An adequate review of background but limited review of incidence or prevalence. Current evidence supports background and significance.

16.0 pts

Meets- Limited review of Background AND limited review of incidence/prevalence. OR Lack current evidence to support.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Background, incidence and prevalence is unclear. missing one or more key point (background, prevelance or incidence). AND Lack of evidence to support.

0.0 pts

Developing-Background and significance of the marginalized group is not discussed.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocio-Economic issues of the problem

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Clearly presents and fully explains the socio economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.

18.0 pts

Exceeds-Adequate review of socio-economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.

16.0 pts

Meets- Limited review of the socio-economic issues of marginalized group OR Lack of current supporting evidence.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Minimal or unclear review socio-economic issues of marginalized group AND lack of current supporting evidence.

0.0 pts

Developing-Socio-Economic issue(s) not reviewed.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of chosen marginalized group

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Comprehensive review social injustice is discussed along with its relationship to health disparitities and health care. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Adequate review of social injustice with some discussio of its relationship to health disparities and health care but lacks one major point or is not succinct. supported by current scholarly evidence.

16.0 pts

Meets- Limited review of social injustice. Limitied discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care. Main points lack detailed development. Supported by current scholarly evidence

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Minimal review of social injustice. Minimal discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care. OR Information presented is NOT Supported by current scholarly evidence.

0.0 pts

Developing- No discussion of social injustice and relationship to health disparitities and health care.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical issues of the chosen marginalized group

25.0 pts

Exceptional- Comprehensive review of ethical issues current supporting evidence.

22.0 pts

Exceeds- Adequate review of ethical issues. Main points lack detailed development. Current supporting evidence.

21.0 pts

Meets- Limited review of ethical issues. list ethical issues or arrange them randomly rather than using any logical structure. OR Lack of cuurent supporting evidence.

10.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Minimal or unclear review of ethical issues AND lack of current supporting evidence.

0.0 pts

Developing- Ethical issues are not discussed.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)

30.0 pts

Exceptional- A comprehensive plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; three evidence-based actions to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

26.0 pts

Exceeds- An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; OR Two evidence- based actions fully discussed to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

24.0 pts

Meets- A limited plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; Two evidence-based actions discussed to address the impact. Outcomes not discussed. Limited or little current evidence used for support.

12.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Plan is unclear OR One evidence- based actions discussed to address the impact. Outcomes not discussed AND Lack of current supporting evidence.

0.0 pts

Developing- Plan of action not provided.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10.0 pts

Exceptional- The conclusion thoroughly, clearly, succinctly, and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action.

9.0 pts

Exceeds- The conclusion adequately and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action, but lacks one major point or is not succinct.

8.0 pts

Meets- The conclusion is a limited review of key points of the paper, is not succinct, or lacks one or more major points of the paper or clear direction for action.

4.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Conclusion is unclear or significantly limited in overview of the paper.

0.0 pts

Developing- Conclusion not provided.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, APA

5.0 pts

Exceptional- APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors.

4.0 pts

Exceeds- One to three errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

3.0 pts

Meets- Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0.0 pts

Developing- Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and punctuation OR repeatedly makes the same errors throughout the paper.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0

What our customers say
_____

Ishita M.Ishita M.
Great Job! Thank you so much for your work. You got it done faster than I imagined and everything is perfect. Will definitely be using you again!
Megan J.Megan J.
"As a wife, mother, and full-time student, I was struggling to try to go back to school and take care of my responsibilities. Sometimes you just need a little help, and I appreciate all the help I have gotten from Academic Research Bureau. My papers are on-time and the writers are easy to work with. Thanks for the support!"
Rajab M.Rajab M.
Universitywritingservices.com has saved me a lot of time. I was tired of taking the same classes many times over again. As an ESL student, my professors were taking points off of my assignments for my grammar mistakes. It made it very hard to feel encouraged to continue with my studies. Thankful for having found an answer for better grades."
Frank N.Frank N.
As a working student, I just really don't have the time to write paper after paper and complete assignment after assignment. Working full-time and going to school was nearly impossible until I was able to feel comfortable with the writers on this site. They make me feel secure enough to trust them with my papers. While I'm busy with life, they are busy writing my papers. They always do an outstanding job!
Courtney B.Courtney B.
Thank you! You were really patient with me and my needs. This was my first time using you guys, however, I will definitely be using you again!
John H.John H.
I cannot tell you enough how amazing your company is! Your writers are superb, on time, excellent content, so very thankful you reached out to me that day! Lifesaver for sure! Couldn’t be happier with the results I’ve gotten from my first 2 papers with you, I have 4 papers left to go and I’ll be using your company for them all!
Rebecca T.Rebecca T.
After I ordered a dissertation from your writing service, the first paper that I was given did not met my professor’s demand. I set the paper on revision and the writer made the revision for free meeting all my requirements and I was very satisfied
Thomas R.Thomas R.
I was shocked by how your writers managed to deliver my paper on time, and I was among the best in our class in that paper. Thank you so much and I will never hesitate to use you
error: protected!!