Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

Abstract (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page – single space is acceptable ) Clearly and concisely identify purpose (to include issue and brief significance), process (PET Model), and outcome (decision made with brief rationale) in a 1 page with headings for each section (Should appear on a page of its own following the title page).

EBP Final Paper

Guidelines for Paper:

Apply the following steps of the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based PET Model for the paper

  • Abstract (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page – single space is acceptable )
    • Clearly and concisely identify purpose (to include issue and brief significance), process (PET Model), and outcome (decision made with brief rationale) in a 1 page with headings for each section (Should appear on a page of its own following the title page).
    • Be sure to review the Guidelines and Grading Rubric below before and throughout creation of your abstract.
  • Introduction/Practice Question (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page)
    • Define the problem
    • Discuss the significance of the problem
    • Describe the purpose of the paper
    • Identify the specific practice issue to be addressed, include setting & population (using PICO)
  • Synthesis of Evidence (20% of paper grade, approximately 3-4 pages)
    • Review the research-based literature concerning the selected topic of at least 7 research articles
    • Summarize the research findings from the literature review (attach the tableafter the references page)
    • Critique the body of research on the topic as a whole (using the critiquing guidelines presented throughout the NSG 415 course)
    • Describe the methodological strengths and limitations of the current research
  • Translation- Fit and Feasibility (25% of paper grade, approximately 2-3 pages)
    • Describe the similarity/differences of the characteristics of the sample and environment to those of the population in the practice area for the proposed utilization project
    • Detail what stakeholders would need to be involved in this change of practice
    • Explain the amount of resources that would be needed to implement such a change in practice.
  • Translation Path Recommendation (25% of paper grade, approximately 2-3 pages)
    • Given the evaluation, describe what decision you would make about the utilization of the findings at this point; Include rationale for your decision
    • If determined appropriate for translation, create an action plan with the ‘change’ steps needed to implement the findings.
    • If determined not appropriate for translation, describe your next steps for further research.
    • Conclusion sentences (paragraph) at the end of the paper
  • Organization of Paper and Writing Style (5% of paper grade)
  • APA Format (5% of paper grade)- Need a total of at least 10 sources

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric for the Final EBP Paper 

 

Category  

Excellent

 

 

 

Good

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Poor

 

 

Possible Points

 

Abstract Exemplary; Clearly and concisely identifies purpose to include issue and brief significance, and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; use of headings of background, purpose, methods, results, and conclusion, 1 page Proficient; Clearly identifies 2 of the 3: purpose to include issue and brief significance,  and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; noheadings Incomplete; Clearly identifies 1 of the 3: purpose to include issue and brief significance, and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; no headings Absent; Fails to include the abstract  

 

 

10

Introduction/Practice Question  

Exemplary; Purpose of the paper well developed and clearly stated; Clearly identified the specific issue to be addressed, include setting & population; Sound significance of the problem developed from concepts, theories and literature

 

Proficient; Purpose of the paper apparent but not developed sufficiently; Issue apparent but not described sufficiently, lacking specificity for setting &/or population;  Significance relevant but limited development

 

Incomplete; Purpose of the paper poorly developed, not clear; Issue poorly described, lacking setting or population; Significance not developed, limited support for ideas Absent; Purpose of paper absent; issue not relevant to purpose of the paper, lacking both setting and population; Significance not relevant to issue, lacks support for ideas 10
Synthesis of Evidence  

Exemplary; Conducted a thorough review of  the research-based literature concerning the selected topic,7 or more relevant research articles analyzed;  Synthesized the summary of the research findings; Accurately and effectively critiqued the body of research, clearly identified and described the methodological strengths and limitations of the current research

Table included

 

Proficient; Conducted a good review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, 5-6 relevant research articles used; Summarized the major highlights of the research findings; Most of the research critique was accurate, lacked depth/insight into strengths and limitations of current research

Table not included

 

Incomplete; Conducted a fair review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, 4 relevant research articles used; Provided a limited summary of the research findings; Incomplete critique of the research findings, missed major strengths and limitations of current research

 

Absent; Conducted a poor review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, < 4 relevant research articles used; Major gaps in summary of research findings; Lacks critique of research findings, lacked strengths and limitations of current research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

Category  

Excellent

 

 

 

Good

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Poor

 

 

Points

Earned

Translation- Fit and Feasibility Exemplary; Synthesized and integrated the compare and contrast of the recommendation from review of research to current level of practice; Accurately identified stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change Proficient; Provided an accurate compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Most of the identified stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change were accurate Incomplete; Provided a limited compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Failed to identify several stakeholders to involve or resources needed for change Absent; Lacked a compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Failed to identify stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change 25
Translation Path Recommend-ation Exemplary; Excellent evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Decision and rationale relevant to review of research and comprehensive and in depth; Change steps needed and method of evaluation accurate and clearly described;

Clear and logical conclusion

Proficient; Good evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Decision and rationale relevant to review of research, lacks depth; Change steps needed and method of evaluation mostly accurate; address conclusion Incomplete; Fair evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Either decision or rationale lacks relevancy to review of research; Change steps needed or method of evaluation not accurate;

No conclusion

Absent; Poor evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Both decision and rationale lacks relevancy to review of research; Both change steps needed and method of evaluation not accurate 25
Organization of Paper and Writing Style Exemplary; Ideas well organized and logically presented, organization supports development of ideas; Thorough discussion of ideas, includes multiple perspectives; Effective transitions from one idea to another and effective summaries with integration of ideas; clear conclusion; Sentence structure clear, correct grammar and punctuation, no spelling errors Proficient; Clear organization of main points and ideas; Adequate discussion of ideas, alternate perspectives considered; Adequate transitions from one idea to another and adequate summary of ideas; Adequate sentence structure with conclusion; minimal grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors Incomplete; Ideas not developed clearly throughout entire paper; Discussion lacks details at times, minimal alternate perspectives considered; Confusing transitions from one idea to anther and summaries lack integration of ideas; Inadequate sentence structure with unclear conclusion, several grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors Absent; Lacks organization and flow; Lacks discussion of ideas – ideas merely stated without discussion; Lacks transitions from one idea to another and lacks summaries of ideas; Poor sentence structure with no conclusion, numerous grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors 5
APA Format Exemplary; Solicited and referenced more than an adequate number of resources, citations cited accurately, reference list correct;  Professional appearance of paper, adheres to APA format of 10 or more references Proficient; Solicited and referenced fewer than expected resources, 2-3 mistakes noted with citations and in reference list; Paper legible, 2-3 errors noted in APA format;

7-9 references

 

Incomplete; Solicited and referenced suboptimal number of resources, 4-6 errors noted with citations and in reference list; Unprofessional appearance, 4-6 errors noted in APA format.

5-6 references

Absent; Solicited and referenced too few resources; >6errors noted with citations and in reference list; Unprofessional appearance, >6 errors noted in APA format

<5 references

5

 

 

What our customers say
_____

Ishita M.Ishita M.
Great Job! Thank you so much for your work. You got it done faster than I imagined and everything is perfect. Will definitely be using you again!
Megan J.Megan J.
"As a wife, mother, and full-time student, I was struggling to try to go back to school and take care of my responsibilities. Sometimes you just need a little help, and I appreciate all the help I have gotten from Academic Research Bureau. My papers are on-time and the writers are easy to work with. Thanks for the support!"
Rajab M.Rajab M.
Universitywritingservices.com has saved me a lot of time. I was tired of taking the same classes many times over again. As an ESL student, my professors were taking points off of my assignments for my grammar mistakes. It made it very hard to feel encouraged to continue with my studies. Thankful for having found an answer for better grades."
Frank N.Frank N.
As a working student, I just really don't have the time to write paper after paper and complete assignment after assignment. Working full-time and going to school was nearly impossible until I was able to feel comfortable with the writers on this site. They make me feel secure enough to trust them with my papers. While I'm busy with life, they are busy writing my papers. They always do an outstanding job!
Courtney B.Courtney B.
Thank you! You were really patient with me and my needs. This was my first time using you guys, however, I will definitely be using you again!
John H.John H.
I cannot tell you enough how amazing your company is! Your writers are superb, on time, excellent content, so very thankful you reached out to me that day! Lifesaver for sure! Couldn’t be happier with the results I’ve gotten from my first 2 papers with you, I have 4 papers left to go and I’ll be using your company for them all!
Rebecca T.Rebecca T.
After I ordered a dissertation from your writing service, the first paper that I was given did not met my professor’s demand. I set the paper on revision and the writer made the revision for free meeting all my requirements and I was very satisfied
Thomas R.Thomas R.
I was shocked by how your writers managed to deliver my paper on time, and I was among the best in our class in that paper. Thank you so much and I will never hesitate to use you
error: protected!!